Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Corey Gruber's avatar

“The blessed cannot be moved by the passions.” — Summa Theologiae I-II, q. 26–28

Saint Peter: “I redden and spark.” (John Ciardi’s 1970 translation of Paradiso)

It’s taken me far too long to realize what should have been intuitively obvious by now, and has become crystal clear in this beautiful canto: Dante meets no evil in Paradiso. Yes, evil is an ongoing concern, but it has no positive existence — in Paradise, it’s now an object of scorn and denunciation. The Bête noire is defanged and banished. Grasping Dante’s genius in this audacious and courageous shift from darkness to light was aided by Richard Hughes Gibson’s new book, “The Way of Dante, Going Through Hell, Purgatory, and Heaven with C. S. Lewis, Dorothy L. Sayers, and Charles Williams” (December 2, 2025). In it, he says: “In Paradiso, I am proposing, Dante attempted something far more audacious than he had in Inferno and even Purgatorio: to write a story in which evil does not move the plot along.”

How then, does Dante move it? Gibson says it’s “…not the glory of heroes but the glory of the cosmos’s Maker and Sustainer.” But can something as esoteric as cosmic glory (divine radiance, hierarchy, and ultimate fulfillment) cause the poem to sparkle for a reader who, until Paradiso, has been fed a steady diet of demons, Dis, and eyes sewn shut?

Again, Gibson: “In his 1941 sermon “The Weight of Glory,” Lewis takes up the topic of glory reluctantly: “There is no getting away from the fact that this idea”—the idea of glory—“is very prominent in the New Testament and in early Christian writings,” Lewis writes. “Salvation is constantly associated with palms, crowns, white robes, thrones, and splendor like the sun and stars. All this makes no immediate appeal to me at all, and in that respect I fancy I am a typical modern.” Glory, he goes on to note, suggests two more troublesome ideas: “fame” and “luminosity.” The first seems to him “wicked,” since it sounds like a “competitive passion,” a grasping to be higher than others better suited to hell than heaven. “As for the second,” he suggests, “who wishes to become a kind of living electric light bulb?”

If it means joining Saint Peter’s legions of Miles Christi, then light me up! Dante has made ferocious indignation a bedfellow of ethereal glory, and it’s delivered by none other than the princeps militiae ecclesiae — the first and supreme captain of the Church Militant, Peter, who takes a righteous pole-axe to corrupt pontiffs. His is the language of a commander rallying the soldiers of Christ. His abrupt detonation avoids an anticlimactic crash (in spite of a procession of stolid test proctors and dancing light bulbs) and transforms “glory” into both beautiful transcendence and a dynamic force of stern judgement.

How, you ask, can a perfectly beatified soul speak with such furor? Let’s start by remembering what his reddened visage actually embodies: he was crucified upside down; the fiery redness symbolizes the blood rushing to his head. This scene is not a display of martyr’s blood, human passion, or disordered anger, though; Dante colors it with Peter’s zeal rather than his blood. That’s right — feel the burn of red hot zeal — holiness does not mean passive serenity. The blessed are not emotionally lobotomized, and beatitude does not erase the capacity for holy hollering. Perfect love is fierce, luminous and judicial. God cannot be indifferent to a wolf (clerical greed) tearing at the throat of the lamb (the Church). Dispensing holy heck is “ira per zelum (zealous, rational anger) and reflects God’s severe charity. C.S. Lewis reminded us not to mistake kindness for love; there’s no contradiction between beatitude and vehemence when Peter is assaulting the deformity of earthly evil. Charles Williams, in his novel Descent Into Hell, said “Good…contains terror, not terror good” during a discussion of salvation as a “frightening good.” This is terror as in tremble-inducing awe and purifying force when confronting human brokenness.

What’s Saint Peter’s message to those still on the “threshing floor”? For God’s will to be done on earth as it is in heaven. Step out into the light…or else.

P.S. I couldn’t help but think of G.K. Chesterton when I read Beatrice’s line “For innocence and trust are to be found only in little children...” Chesterton and his wife were childless, and their engagement with children of family, friends and neighbors was charming and gracious. He spoke of his house as “unexpectedly invaded by infants of all shapes and sizes”. Although playing with children was “a glorious thing”, it reminded him, “not of watering little budding flowers, but of wrestling for hours with gigantic angels and devils”; there’s moral dilemmas they posed taxed even his formidable intellect:

“Moral problems of the most monstrous complexity besiege him incessantly. He has to decide before the awful eyes of innocence, whether, when a sister has knocked down a brother’s bricks, in revenge for the brother having taken two sweets out of his turn, it is endurable that the brother should retaliate by scribbling on the sister’s picture book, and whether such conduct does not justify the sister in blowing out the brother’s unlawfully lighted match.”

Jennifer Degani's avatar

Your philosophical exercise for this canto was very helpful. You put into words something that helped illuminate what was revealed in the canto while letting it be mysterious. The distinction between what can be quantified and what can’t is an important one.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?