Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Corey Gruber's avatar

“No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man.” — Heraclitus

This is the case with Eden, too. The depiction in Canto XXVIII is not the prelapsarian biblical Eden, but rather a transformed or “restored” Eden. Commentators such as Singleton and Hollander affirm this is a “recovered” Eden. Biblical Eden 1.0 was a place of pre-Fall perfection, innocent and unspoiled; Dante’s Eden 2.0 is, instead, a space for spiritual restoration, and the bridge between penitents’ purgation and their ascent to Paradise. The forest has indeed changed. As has Dante.

P.S. Dante’s beautiful sculpting of Eden 2.0 is captivating. I was particularly taken with the “little birds” as representations of the innocence and unspoiled nature of Eden 1.0. The taint of Adam and Eve’s transgression and expulsion, as Romans 8:19–22 notes, means Creation is “subjected to futility,” and “groaning” due to sin, implying even little birds need to be “liberated from bondage to decay.” Their singing, to me, is not blissful indifference to the most profound human moral failure (the Fall), but rather an epitaph for the Fallen:“Not one would mind, neither bird nor tree / If mankind perished utterly.” (from Sara Teasdale’s poem “There Will Come Soft Rains”)

Donna's avatar

Best Canto so far.

No posts

Ready for more?