Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ExcessDeathsAU's avatar

Well done Vashik and Lisa.

Grazie.

Corey Gruber's avatar

Although I’m an amateur swimming against the current, I think “confirmation” or “confession” are more theologically precise than the “doctoral examination” metaphor that dominates the commentaries. As Hollander notes, “St. Peter propounds the question, and Dante adduces what he considers to be the fitting arguments, but the conclusion is determined beforehand.”

I read XXIV to be more “bearing witness” than “test me so I can pass.” In the subsequent cantos, Dante, too, seems to favor the language of confirmation; what transpires feels like public testimony, not private examination. Some of my reading suggests his interaction with Saint Peter mirrors the rite of Confirmation that existed in the poet’s time, which included a bishop circling a candidate three times. (In my personal experience, professors grading a thesis usually don’t dance around you, but that may be more of a commentary on my scholastic abilities than my professors’ proclivity for dancing.)

If Dante is making a solemn, public, sacramental confession of the “Text,” and is being confirmed as God’s scribe, then he is now writing the Commedia with full apostolic authority. He didn’t merely demonstrate that he read the assigned homework, he publicly and proudly ratified that the whole textbook and his vision are now congruent as one single Text. He can confess (and inscribe) the revealed Word with fidelity, knowing his faith is infused by divine grace and verified by orthodoxy.

No posts

Ready for more?